Key result
The use of a long-straight sheath significantly increased the success rate of atrial lead insertion at the right atrial septum compared to the standard method (96.1% vs 54.2%, p<0.01).
Why the study?
Does the use of a long-straight sheath improve the success rate of atrial lead insertion at the right atrial septum in patients requiring pacing?
Observational (n=76)
No
Does the use of a long-straight sheath improve the success rate of atrial lead insertion at the right atrial septum in patients requiring pacing?
The use of a long-straight sheath significantly improves procedural success and reduces operation time for right atrial septal pacing lead insertion.
BACKGROUND: Pacing at the right atrial septum (RAS) appears to be superior to that performed at the right atrial appendage for preventing paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and for reducing complications. However, atrial lead insertion at the RAS is difficult and time-consuming. Although a few useful devices have been reported, handling of the atrial lead around the RAS is sometimes difficult even with those devices. Therefore, in the present study a long-straight sheath (LSS) was used in an attempt to secure sufficient space for handling the atrial lead around the RAS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-six consecutive patients who underwent insertion of an atrial lead at the RAS from a left-sided approach were examined. The non-LSS group comprised 24 patients and the LSS group had 52. The success rate of atrial lead insertion was significantly higher in the LSS group than in the non-LSS group [50/52 (96.1%) vs 13/24 (54.2%); p<0.01]. The operation time was significantly shorter in the LSS group (13.6+/-9.1 min vs 32.7+/-11.1 min, p<0.01). P wave duration was significantly shorter during RAS pacing than during normal sinus rhythm. CONCLUSION: The LSS technique is useful for atrial lead insertion at the RAS because it enables sufficient space to be secured for lead handling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishii et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Patients requiring atrial lead insertion at the right atrial septum (n=76). Long-straight sheath (LSS) vs. Standard method (non-LSS) was evaluated on Success rate of atrial lead insertion at the right atrial septum (p=<0.01). The use of a long-straight sheath significantly increased the success rate of atrial lead insertion at the right atrial septum compared to the standard method (96.1% vs 54.2%, p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: