Key result
Vagal nerve stimulation significantly attenuated the reduction in left atrial strain caused by atrial fibrillation in a canine model of heart failure.
Why the study?
Does vagal nerve stimulation mitigate the effects of atrial fibrillation on left atrial function and size in a canine model of heart failure?
RCT (n=24)
Single-blind
2:1 fashion
No
Does vagal nerve stimulation mitigate the effects of atrial fibrillation on left atrial function and size in a canine model of heart failure?
p-value: p=0.001
In a canine model of heart failure and atrial fibrillation, vagal nerve stimulation mitigated the decline in left atrial strain without significantly impacting left atrial size.
VNS attenuated further LA strain decline during AF in HF dogs; leaves open clinical translation.
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to assess how atrial fibrillation (AF) induction, chronicity, and RR interval irregularity affect left atrial (LA) function and size in the setting of underlying heart failure (HF), and to determine whether AF effects can be mitigated by vagal nerve stimulation (VNS). METHODS: HF was induced by 4-weeks of rapid ventricular pacing in 24 dogs. Subsequently, AF was induced and maintained by atrial pacing at 600 bpm. Dogs were randomized into control (n = 9) and VNS (n = 15) groups. In the VNS group, atrioventricular node fat pad stimulation (310 μs, 20 Hz, 3-7 mA) was delivered continuously for 6 months. LA volume and LA strain data were calculated from bi-weekly echocardiograms. RESULTS: RR intervals decreased with HF in both groups (p = 0.001), and decreased further during AF in control group (p = 0.014), with a non-significant increase in the VNS group during AF. LA size increased with HF (p<0.0001), with no additional increase during AF. LA strain decreased with HF (p = 0.025) and further decreased after induction of AF (p = 0.0001). LA strain decreased less (p = 0.001) in the VNS than in the control group. Beat-by-beat analysis showed a curvilinear increase of LA strain with longer preceding RR interval, (r = 0.45, p <0.0001) with LA strain 1.1% higher (p = 0.02) in the VNS-treated animals, independent of preceding RR interval duration. The curvilinear relationship between ratio of preceding and pre-preceding RR intervals, and subsequent LA strain was weaker, (r = 0.28, p = 0.001). However, VNS-treated animals again had higher LA strain (by 2.2%, p = 0.002) independently of the ratio of preceding and pre-preceding RR intervals. CONCLUSIONS: In the underlying presence of pacing-induced HF, AF decreased LA strain, with little impact on LA size. LA strain depends on the preceding RR interval duration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldberg et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation (n=24). Vagal nerve stimulation vs. Control (no stimulation) was evaluated on Left atrial (LA) strain (p=0.001). Vagal nerve stimulation significantly attenuated the reduction in left atrial strain caused by atrial fibrillation in a canine model of heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: