Key result
A single-pill combination of amlodipine/valsartan significantly increased the 8-week blood pressure control rate compared to amlodipine monotherapy (69.2% vs 57.6%; p=0.0013).
Why the study?
Does a single-pill combination of amlodipine/valsartan improve blood pressure reduction and control compared to amlodipine monotherapy in Asian hypertensive patients inadequately controlled on amlodipine?
RCT (n=698)
double-blind
randomised
Yes
Does a single-pill combination of amlodipine/valsartan improve blood pressure reduction and control compared to amlodipine monotherapy in Asian hypertensive patients inadequately controlled on amlodipine?
A single-pill combination of amlodipine/valsartan provides superior blood pressure reduction and control compared to amlodipine monotherapy in Asian patients with inadequately controlled hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports amlodipine/valsartan single-pill use over monotherapy in Asian patients uncontrolled on amlodipine; extends prior RCT evidence to this population.
OBJECTIVE: The antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine/valsartan combination has not been evaluated in Asian patients as previous large-scale studies enrolled very few patients. This multicentre, randomised, double-blind study assessed the efficacy and safety of a single-pill combination of amlodipine/valsartan versus amlodipine in Asian hypertensive patients. METHODS: After a 1-4-week washout period, patients (mean sitting diastolic BP [msDBP]: >or=95-<110 mmHg) were treated with amlodipine 5 mg for 4 weeks. Patients inadequately controlled on amlodipine (msDBP >or=90 and <110 mmHg) were randomised to receive amlodipine/valsartan 5/80 mg (n = 349) or amlodipine 5 mg (n = 349) for 8 weeks. Efficacy variables were change in msDBP, mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) from baseline (at randomisation) to week 8 endpoint, and BP control rate (<140/90 mmHg) at week 8 endpoint. Safety assessments included monitoring and recording of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. Most patients were Chinese (86.4%), men (65.1%), with a baseline BP 139.5/94.5 mmHg. At week 8 endpoint, the least square mean reduction in BP was significantly greater with amlodipine/valsartan combination than amlodipine monotherapy (-11.4/-9.7 vs. -7.4/-7.1 mmHg; p < 0.0001) with a higher BP control rate (69.2 vs. 57.6%; p = 0.0013). Ambulatory BP monitoring in a subgroup of patients (n = 82), showed a significant 24-h mean BP reduction from baseline with amlodipine/valsartan (-7.3/-6.3 mmHg; p < 0.0001), whereas the reduction was not significant with amlodipine (-0.2/+0.3 mmHg; p > 0.05). The overall incidence of AEs was similar in both groups. Peripheral oedema occurred only in the amlodipine group n = 4 (1.1%) and not in the amlodipine/valsartan combination. Hypotension was reported in only one patient in the amlodipine/valsartan combination. Six patients (0.9%) experienced serious AEs, of which only one SAE, i.e. gastric ulcer, was reported to be related to amlodipine treatment. CONCLUSION: The single-pill combination of amlodipine/valsartan was efficacious and well-tolerated in Asian hypertensive patients who were inadequately controlled on amlodipine alone. As with all clinical trials, the entry criteria may limit the extrapolation of these results to a broader population. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00413049.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ke et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in hypertension (n=698). amlodipine/valsartan vs. amlodipine 5 mg was evaluated on BP control rate (<140/90 mmHg) at week 8 endpoint (p=0.0013). A single-pill combination of amlodipine/valsartan significantly increased the 8-week blood pressure control rate compared to amlodipine monotherapy (69.2% vs 57.6%; p=0.0013).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: