Key result
Combination therapy with olmesartan and amlodipine provided stronger antihypertensive potency and a lower incidence of adverse events compared to monotherapy.
Why the study?
Does combination therapy with olmesartan and amlodipine improve blood pressure control in patients with hypertension compared to monotherapy?
Does combination therapy with olmesartan and amlodipine improve blood pressure control in patients with hypertension compared to monotherapy?
A fixed-dose combination of olmesartan and amlodipine provides effective blood pressure control and potential target organ protection with a favorable safety profile.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports olmesartan-amlodipine consideration in hypertension; leaves open randomized outcome trials for target organ protection.
Because it increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, hypertension is one of most important causes of mortality. To achieve a target blood pressure of 140/90 mmHg, many patients with hypertension require combination therapy. One useful option is a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan and amlodipine. For example, the COACH trial showed that using these drugs in long-term combination therapy, rather than in monotherapy, had many advantages including a lower incidence of adverse events and stronger antihyperten- sive potency. Numerous other clinical trials have supported these findings for olmesartan and amlodipine combination therapy. Given these results, we conclude that combination therapy with olmesartan and amlodipine is clinically useful for the treatment of blood pressure control and may improve target organ protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2010 study conducted a review in Hypertension. Combination therapy with olmesartan and amlodipine vs. Monotherapy was evaluated. Combination therapy with olmesartan and amlodipine provided stronger antihypertensive potency and a lower incidence of adverse events compared to monotherapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: