Key result
A deep neural network filter algorithm for photoplethysmography yielded 86.12% reliable heart rate measurements from 10,036 heartbeats, including those with arrhythmias and artifacts.
Why the study?
Developing automated PPG systems for heart rate measurement is difficult because waveforms are susceptible to motion artifacts and between-patient variation.
A deep neural network filter can reliably derive heart rate from photoplethysmography signals, effectively handling motion artifacts and arrhythmias.
Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a noninvasive technique that can be used to conveniently measure heart rate (HR) and thus obtain relevant health-related information. However, developing an automated PPG system is difficult, because its waveforms are susceptible to motion artifacts and between-patient variation, making its interpretation difficult. We use deep neural network (DNN) filters to mimic the cognitive ability of a human expert who can distinguish the features of PPG altered by noise from various sources. Systolic (S), onset (O), and first derivative peaks (W) are recognized by three different DNN filters. In addition, the boundaries of uninformative regions caused by artifacts are identified by two different filters. The algorithm reliably derives the HR and presents recognition scores for the S, O, and W peaks and artifacts with only a 0.7-s delay. In the evaluation using data from 11 patients obtained from PhysioNet, the algorithm yields 8643 (86.12%) reliable HR measurements from a total of 10 036 heartbeats, including some with uninformative data resulting from arrhythmias and artifacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2021) studied Heart rate measurement (n=11). Deep neural network (DNN) filters for PPG heart rate measurement was evaluated on Reliable heart rate measurements. A deep neural network filter algorithm for photoplethysmography yielded 86.12% reliable heart rate measurements from 10,036 heartbeats, including those with arrhythmias and artifacts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: