Key result
Genetic variations contribute approximately 30-50% to blood pressure variation, though specific candidate genes and causes of hypertension remain unclear due to inconsistent results.
This review highlights the complex genetic basis of hypertension and discusses the current limitations and future perspectives of pharmacogenomics in its management.
Does not support routine genetic testing for hypertension; leaves open identification of consistent variants through larger studies.
Hypertension is a multifactorial disorder that probably results from the inheritance of a number of susceptibility genes and involves multiple environmental determinants. Existing evidence suggests that the genetic contribution to blood pressure variation is about 30-50%. Although a number of candidate genes have been studied in different ethnic populations, results from genetic analysis are still inconsistent and specific causes of hypertension remain unclear. Furthermore, the abundance of data in the literature makes it difficult to piece together the puzzle of hypertension and to define candidate genes involved in the dynamic of blood pressure regulation. In this review, we attempt to highlight the genetic basis of hypertension pathogenesis, focusing on the most important existing genetic variations of candidate genes and their potential role in the development of this disease. Our objective is to review current knowledge and discuss limitations to clinical applications of genotypic information in the diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of hypertension. Finally, some principles of pharmacogenomics are presented here along with future perspectives of hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marteau et al. (2005) conducted a review in Hypertension. Genetic variations was evaluated. Genetic variations contribute approximately 30-50% to blood pressure variation, though specific candidate genes and causes of hypertension remain unclear due to inconsistent results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: