Key result
Having 6-7 ideal cardiovascular health metrics was associated with a lower risk of elevated hs-CRP (>3 mg/L) compared to having 0-1 metrics in the general population (OR 0.39).
Why the study?
Does a higher number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics reduce hs-CRP levels in healthy and diabetic populations?
Cross-Sectional (n=101,836)
Does a higher number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics reduce hs-CRP levels in healthy and diabetic populations?
Odds Ratio: 0.39
A higher number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics is associated with lower levels of the inflammatory marker hs-CRP in both healthy and diabetic populations.
BACKGROUND: High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is an inflammatory marker associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk. Health-related behaviors and factors decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease events, but the association between ideal cardiovascular health behaviors and hs-CRP is not clear. This study evaluated the relationship between the number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics and hs-CRP levels. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study from 2006 to 2007 that included 93,967 healthy subjects and 7869 diabetic patients. hs-CRP was measured by high-sensitivity nephelometry. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the association between the number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics and hs-CRP levels in the general population and in non-diabetic and diabetic subjects. RESULTS: We found that hs-CRP levels decreased as the number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics increased in the general population, different genders, non-diabetic and diabetic subgroups. After adjusting for traditional risk factors, logistic regression analyses revealed that the risk of hs-CRP >3 mg/L in the general population with 6-7 ideal cardiovascular health metrics was 0.39 times lower than in those with 0-1 ideal metrics. Similarly, the risks were 0.39 times lower than in those with 0-1 ideal metrics in non-diabetic population. The risk of hs-CRP >3 mg/L in the diabetic population with 4-6 ideal cardiovascular health metrics was 0.45 times lower than those with 0-1 ideal metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate an inverse relationship between the number of ideal health metrics and hs-CRP in the general population, and similar relationships were observed for different gender, non-diabetic and diabetic subgroups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xue et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in General population and diabetic patients (n=101,836). 6-7 ideal cardiovascular health metrics vs. 0-1 ideal cardiovascular health metrics was evaluated on hs-CRP >3 mg/L (OR 0.39). Having 6-7 ideal cardiovascular health metrics was associated with a lower risk of elevated hs-CRP (>3 mg/L) compared to having 0-1 metrics in the general population (OR 0.39).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: