Key result
Zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide similarly reduced 24-hour systolic blood pressure (7.6 mmHg vs 9.5 mmHg, p=0.155) compared to irbesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients uncontrolled by monotherapy.
Why the study?
Does zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide improve blood pressure and pleiotropic markers compared to irbesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients uncontrolled by monotherapy?
Does zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide improve blood pressure and pleiotropic markers compared to irbesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients uncontrolled by monotherapy?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.6% vs 9.5%
p-value: p=0.155
The fixed combination of zofenopril and HCTZ provides similar blood pressure lowering to irbesartan and HCTZ but may offer additional benefits in reducing inflammation and carotid plaque regression in high-risk hypertensive patients.
Supports zofenopril/HCTZ as an alternative to irbesartan/HCTZ; confirms comparable efficacy for monotherapy-uncontrolled hypertension.
Combinations between an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) are among the recommended treatments for hypertensive patients uncontrolled by monotherapy. Four randomized, double-blind, parallel group studies with a similar design, including 1469 hypertensive patients uncontrolled by a previous monotherapy and with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, compared the efficacy of a combination of a sulfhydryl ACE inhibitor (zofenopril at 30 or 60 mg) or an ARB (irbesartan at 150 or 300 mg) plus HCTZ 12.5 mg. The extent of blood pressure (BP)-lowering was assessed in the office and over 24 h. Pleiotropic features of the treatments were evaluated by studying their effect on systemic inflammation, organ damage, arterial stiffness, and metabolic biochemical parameters. Both treatments similarly reduced office and ambulatory BPs after 18-24 weeks. In the ZODIAC study a larger reduction in high sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) was observed under zofenopril (-0.52 vs. +0.97 mg/dL under irbesartan, p = 0.001), suggesting a potential protective effect against the development of atherosclerosis. In the ZENITH study the rate of carotid plaque regression was significantly larger under zofenopril (32% vs. 16%; p = 0.047). In the diabetic patients of the ZAMES study, no adverse effects of treatments on blood glucose and lipids as well as an improvement of renal function were observed. In patients with isolated systolic hypertension of the ZEUS study, a slight and similar improvement in renal function and small reductions in pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (AI), and central systolic BP were documented with both treatments. Thus, the fixed combination of zofenopril and HCTZ may have a relevant place in the treatment of high-risk or monotherapy-treated uncontrolled hypertensive patients requiring a more prompt, intensive, and sustained BP reduction, in line with the recommendations of current guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omboni et al. (2017) conducted a review in Hypertension uncontrolled by monotherapy (n=1,535). Zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide vs. Irbesartan 150 or 300 mg + 12.5 mg HCTZ was evaluated on 24-hour systolic blood pressure reduction (pooled ABPM analysis) (p=0.155). Zofenopril plus hydrochlorothiazide similarly reduced 24-hour systolic blood pressure (7.6 mmHg vs 9.5 mmHg, p=0.155) compared to irbesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients uncontrolled by monotherapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: