Key result
This review summarizes existing methods for vital sign monitoring in vehicles, including capacitive electrocardiogram, ballistocardiography, and seismocardiography, alongside signal processing methods.
Why the study?
Vital sign monitoring in cars is prone to various disturbances and artifacts, necessitating a summary and comparison of methods integrated into car seats alongside advanced signal processing solutions.
This review highlights the potential and technical challenges of integrating vital sign monitoring systems like cECG, BCG, and SCG into vehicle seats.
Promising for in-vehicle cardiac monitoring; leaves open validation before clinical adoption.
This paper focuses on a thorough summary of vital function measuring methods in vehicles. The focus of this paper is to summarize and compare already existing methods integrated into car seats with the implementation of inter alia capacitive electrocardiogram (cECG), mechanical motion analysis Ballistocardiography (BCG) and Seismocardiography (SCG). In addition, a comprehensive overview of other methods of vital sign monitoring, such as camera-based systems or steering wheel sensors, is also presented in this article. Furthermore, this work contains a very thorough background study on advanced signal processing methods and their potential application for the purpose of vital sign monitoring in cars, which is prone to various disturbances and artifacts occurrence that have to be eliminated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Šidiková et al. (2020) conducted a review in Vital sign monitoring in vehicles. Vital sign monitoring methods (cECG, BCG, SCG) was evaluated. This review summarizes existing methods for vital sign monitoring in vehicles, including capacitive electrocardiogram, ballistocardiography, and seismocardiography, alongside signal processing methods.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: