Key result
Arterial hypertension induced by l-NAME treatment over 2 and 14 days in conscious rats does not show sympathetic overactivity compared to normotensive rats.
Why the study?
Does l-NAME treatment induce sympathetic overactivity in conscious rats?
Does l-NAME treatment induce sympathetic overactivity in conscious rats?
Arterial hypertension induced by l-NAME treatment over 2 and 14 days in conscious rats is not driven by sympathetic overactivity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
l-NAME hypertension in conscious rats lacks sympathetic overactivity; leaves open alternative mechanisms and precludes clinical extrapolation.
The role played by the sympathetic drive in the development of N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME)-induced hypertension is not firmly established. Therefore, the present study was undertaken in conscious rats in which hypertension was induced by treatment with l-NAME over the course of either 2 or 14 days. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured via a catheter placed in the femoral artery, drugs were administered via a cannula placed in the femoral vein, and renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) was monitored using an implanted electrode. Despite the remarkable increase in arterial pressure, heart rate did not change after treatment with l-NAME. RSNA was similar in l-NAME-induced hypertensive rats treated over the course of 2 or 14 days, as well as in normotensive rats. It was also demonstrated that l-NAME-induced hypertensive rats displayed a resetting of the baroreflex control of RSNA to hypertensive levels, with decreased sensitivity over the course of 2 or 14 days. Furthermore, the sympathetic-vagal balance examined in the time and frequency domain and the renal and plasma norepinephrine content did not differ between groups. In conclusion, the evaluation of the sympathetic drive in conscious rats demonstrated that the arterial hypertension induced by l-NAME treatment over the course of 2 and 14 days does not show sympathetic overactivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2009) studied l-NAME-induced hypertension. l-NAME treatment vs. Normotensive rats was evaluated on Renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) and sympathetic-vagal balance. Arterial hypertension induced by l-NAME treatment over 2 and 14 days in conscious rats does not show sympathetic overactivity compared to normotensive rats.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: