Key result
The RT-LAMP assay exhibited 98.4% identity with the PCR fluorescence probing assay for detecting EV71 viral RNA in clinical specimens, without missing any positive samples.
Why the study?
Does the RT-LAMP assay improve the rapid and sensitive detection of enterovirus 71 compared to PCR fluorescence probing assay in patients with suspected HFMD?
Cross-Sectional (n=123)
No
Does the RT-LAMP assay improve the rapid and sensitive detection of enterovirus 71 compared to PCR fluorescence probing assay in patients with suspected HFMD?
Effect estimate: 98.4% similarity
Absolute Event Rate: 47.2% vs 45.5%
p-value: p=>0.05
The developed RT-LAMP assay is a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for detecting EV71 in clinical specimens, offering a potential alternative to PCR in resource-limited settings.
RT-LAMP may offer rapid EV71 detection in resource-limited settings; leaves open routine adoption pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) caused by enterovirus 71 (EV71) is very common in China. It is difficult to distinguish between EV71 and coxsackievirus A16 (CVA16) infections in clinical HFMD patients. Routine laboratory diagnosis of EV71 infection is time-consuming and requires expensive instruments. In this study, we have developed a one-step, single tube, reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay for rapid and sensitive detection of EV71. METHODS: Six primers that can recognize 6 distinct regions on the VP2 gene of EV71 were designed for RT-LAMP assay. The amplification was completed by incubating all reagents in a single tube with reverse transcriptase and Bst DNA polymerase under the isothermal condition (60°C) for 60 min, and could be evaluated by using GoldView staining under a handheld ultraviolet torch lamp or electrophoresis analysis. RESULTS: A total of 123 specimens collected from suspicious patients with HFMD were simultaneously detected by RT-LAMP and PCR fluorescence probing assay. The RT-LAMP amplified products containing EV71 were digested by HinfI and TaqI restriction endonucleases; in contrast, non-specific products with CVA16, coxsackievirus A4 and coxsackievirus B3 could not be detected in RT-LAMP assay. Meanwhile, RT-LAMP assay could amplify EV71 virus with a detection limit of 1 PFU/ml within 60 min. Compared with PCR fluorescence probing assay, RT-LAMP assay exhibited 98.4% identity during the detection of EV71 viral RNA without the missing of positive samples. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that RT-LAMP is a rapid, sensitive, specific and accurate method for the detection of EV71 in clinical specimens. Therefore, this developed method has potential application for rapid and comprehensive surveillance for EV71 infection, especially in developing country.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) (n=123). RT-LAMP assay vs. PCR fluorescence probing assay was evaluated on Overall similarity between RT-LAMP and PCR fluorescence probing assay for EV71 detection (98.4% similarity, p=>0.05). The RT-LAMP assay exhibited 98.4% identity with the PCR fluorescence probing assay for detecting EV71 viral RNA in clinical specimens, without missing any positive samples.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: