Why the study?
Does RT-LAMP improve the detection rate and sensitivity for EV71 in clinical specimens from suspected HFMD individuals compared to conventional RT-PCR and real-time PCR?
Does RT-LAMP improve the detection rate and sensitivity for EV71 in clinical specimens from suspected HFMD individuals compared to conventional RT-PCR and real-time PCR?
RT-LAMP provides a more sensitive, rapid, and cost-effective method for detecting EV71 in suspected HFMD cases compared to conventional and real-time PCR.
RT-LAMP may improve EV71 detection in HFMD; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to develop a sensitive, specific and rapid approach to diagnose hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) for an early treatment by using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) for detecting EV71 virus was developed, the specificity and sensitivity of RT-LAMP was tested, and the clinical specimens was assayed by the RT-LAMP comparing with conventional reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and real-time PCR. RESULTS: A total of 116 clinical specimens from the suspected HFMD individual were detected with the RT-LAMP. The detection rate for EV71 was 56.89% by RT-LAMP, 41.38% by real-time PCR and 34.48% by RT-PCR. The minimum detection limit of RT-LAMP was 0.01 PFU, both of RT-PCR and real-time PCR was 0.1PFU. Non-cross-reactive amplification with other enteroviruses was detected in the survey reports. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of RT-LAMP is higher than RT-PCR and real-time PCR. The protocol is easy to operate and time saving. It was not an expensive instrument, which was needed; it is an applicable method for rapid diagnosis of the disease, especially in resource-poor countries or in developing countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: