Key result
RT-LAMP assay for EV71 demonstrates ~93% sensitivity and high specificity versus rRT-PCR.
Why the study?
Does a novel RT-LAMP assay accurately and rapidly detect Enterovirus 71 in clinical specimens?
Does a novel RT-LAMP assay accurately and rapidly detect Enterovirus 71 in clinical specimens?
The developed RT-LAMP assay provides a simple, sensitive, and specific method for rapid detection of EV71, suitable for resource-limited settings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support rapid EV71 testing in resource-limited settings; leaves open routine adoption pending larger validation studies.
Human enterovirus 71 (EV71) is the major etiological agent of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD), which is a common infectious disease in young children and infants. EV71 can cause various clinical manifestations and has been associated with severe neurological complications; it has resulted in fatalities during recent outbreaks in Asian-Pacific regions since 1997. The early and rapid detection is critical for prevention and control of EV71 infection, since no vaccine or antiviral drugs are currently available. In this study, a simple and sensitive reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay was developed for rapid detection of EV71. The detection limit of the RT-LAMP assay was approximately 0.01 PFU per reaction mixture, and no cross-reactive amplification with other enteroviruses was observed. The assay was evaluated further with 40 clinical specimens and exhibited 92.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity. This RT-LAMP assay may become a useful alternative in clinical diagnosis of EV71, especially in resource-limited hospitals or rural clinics of China and other countries in the Asian-Pacific region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2010) studied Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) (n=40). RT-LAMP assay vs. rRT-PCR assay was evaluated on Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for EV71 detection. The developed RT-LAMP assay for EV71 exhibited 92.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity compared to rRT-PCR when evaluated with 40 clinical stool specimens.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: