Key result
Cardiac contractility modulation improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 15% to 48% and enabled the up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy in a patient with advanced HFrEF.
Why the study?
Whether cardiac contractility modulation can bridge the hemodynamic vulnerability phase to facilitate GDMT optimization and improve prognosis in advanced HFrEF limited by hypotension remains unclear.
Does cardiac contractility modulation improve GDMT tolerance and cardiac remodeling in a patient with advanced HFrEF and hypotension?
Case Report (n=1)
Does cardiac contractility modulation improve GDMT tolerance and cardiac remodeling in a patient with advanced HFrEF and hypotension?
CCM may serve as a promising strategy to improve hemodynamics and facilitate GDMT optimization in patients with advanced HFrEF who are intolerant to medical therapy due to hypotension.
CCM may enable therapy in hypotensive HFrEF patients unable to tolerate GDMT; extends device options in advanced HF.
Background: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has been demonstrated to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. However, many patients, especially those with advanced HFrEF, are unable to tolerate optimal GDMT due to hypotension. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a novel therapeutic approach that enhances myocardial contractility and reverses cardiac remodeling, thereby improving cardiac function and quality of life in patients with HFrEF. However, whether CCM can bridge the hemodynamic vulnerability phase to facilitate GDMT optimization and improve patient prognosis remains unclear. Case presentation: YHA functional class III) had recurrent hospitalizations for HF over the past 4 years. Due to hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg), the patient was unable to tolerate full-dose GDMT, with sacubitril-valsartan limited to 25 mg twice daily, metoprolol succinate to 23.75 mg once daily, and spironolactone to 20 mg once daily. After a comprehensive evaluation, a CCM device was implanted as the most effective and evidence-based option. Postoperatively, the patient's blood pressure gradually improved, allowing initiation of the four major therapeutic drug classes, which were uptitrated to the maximum tolerated doses. With regular follow-up for 12 months, the patient showed dramatic improvements in exercise capacity and quality of life. More surprisingly, there was significant improvement in cardiac structural and functional remodeling. Echocardiography revealed that left atrioventricular dimensions returned to normal, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased from 15% to 48%, and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) improved from -3.3% to -16.2%. NT-proBNP levels also decreased from 6,553 pg/ml to within the normal range. Conclusion: This case suggests that CCM may serve as a promising strategy to address the issue of poor GDMT tolerance due to hypotension, thereby facilitating GDMT optimization and improving cardiac remodeling patients with HFrEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2025) conducted a case report in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=1). Cardiac contractility modulation was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and tolerance to guideline-directed medical therapy. Cardiac contractility modulation improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 15% to 48% and enabled the up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy in a patient with advanced HFrEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: