Why the study?
Can nested PCR effectively detect and identify human picornaviruses in clinical specimens, including heart biopsies from patients with dilative cardiomyopathy?
Can nested PCR effectively detect and identify human picornaviruses in clinical specimens, including heart biopsies from patients with dilative cardiomyopathy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nested PCR provides a highly sensitive method for detecting picornaviruses in clinical samples, demonstrating a higher prevalence of viral RNA in the myocardium of patients with dilative cardiomyopathy compared to controls.
A nested PCR for the detection and rapid identification of human picornaviruses is described. Enteroviruses and rhinoviruses were amplified with the same set of four primers from the 5'-noncoding region. The nested primers allowed the detection of far less than 1 PFU in diluted virus stocks without Southern blot hybridization. In patients with neurological disorders (mainly aseptic meningitis), 43% of 37 specimens (11 of 21 cerebrospinal fluid specimens, 2 of 10 serum specimens, and 3 of 6 stool specimens) were positive by PCR. A total of 21% (10 of 47 specimens) of heart biopsy specimens from patients with dilative cardiomyopathy were PCR positive, whereas 3% (2 of 70 specimens) of control biopsy specimens from patients with coronary artery disease were PCR positive. PCR-amplified fragments from 27 of 29 clinical isolates and 14 of 28 patient samples were successfully serotyped by restriction enzyme digestion. Two specimens were further investigated by direct sequencing of PCR products, leading to the identification of a poliovirus type 3 isolate with a sequence that was highly divergent from previously published sequences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kämmerer et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: