Why the study?
Data concerning the impact of stent generation on long-term outcomes in STEMI patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary PCI with culprit-only or multivessel PCI are limited.
Does the use of newer generation stents (2G-DES) improve clinical outcomes compared to older stents (1G-DES, BMS) in STEMI patients with multivessel disease undergoing culprit-only or multivessel PCI?
Does the use of newer generation stents (2G-DES) improve clinical outcomes compared to older stents (1G-DES, BMS) in STEMI patients with multivessel disease undergoing culprit-only or multivessel PCI?
Second-generation drug-eluting stents are associated with the lowest incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 2 years compared to first-generation DES and bare-metal stents in STEMI patients with multivessel disease, regardless of whether they undergo culprit-only or multivessel PCI.
Newer-generation DES may lower MACE in STEMI with MVD regardless of PCI strategy; leaves open whether stent generation modifies C- vs M-PCI effects.
BACKGROUND: Data concerning the impact of stent generation on long-term outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease (MVD) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with culprit-only PCI (C-PCI) or multivessel PCI (M-PCI) are limited. METHODS: A total of 7,266 patients were separated into the two groups, a C-PCI (n = 4,901) or M-PCI group (n = 2,365). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and any repeat revascularization. The secondary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of stent thrombosis (ST) at 2 years. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of MACE was significantly higher in the bare-metal stents (BMS) group than the first-generation (1G)-drug-eluting stents (DES) (C-PCI: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.940; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.389-2.709; p < .001; M-PCI: aHR, 1.544; 95% CI, 1.099-2.074; p = .038), and the second-generation (2G)-DES group (C-PCI: aHR, 2.271; 95% CI, 1.657-3.114; p < .001; M-PCI: aHR, 2.999; 95% CI, 1.899-4.704; p < .001). In the M-PCI group, 1G-DES showed a higher incidence of MACE compared with 2G-DES (aHR, 1.639; 95% CI, 1.028-2.614; p = .004). The cumulative incidences of ST in the both groups were similar. CONCLUSION: The cumulative incidence of MACE was the lowest for 2G-DES, the highest for BMS, and intermediate for 1G-DES in the STEMI patients with MVD after C-PCI or M-PCI. However, cumulative incidence of ST in the two different reperfusion strategy groups was similar regardless of stent generation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: