Why the study?
Does targeted single- and dual-site right ventricular pacing improve acute haemodynamics in adults with congenital heart disease and RBBB undergoing surgical pulmonary valve replacement?
Does targeted single- and dual-site right ventricular pacing improve acute haemodynamics in adults with congenital heart disease and RBBB undergoing surgical pulmonary valve replacement?
Targeted single-site right ventricular pacing at the region of latest activation acutely improves cardiac output in adults with congenital heart disease and RBBB undergoing pulmonary valve replacement, supporting the concept of RV cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Supports targeted RV pacing investigation in ACHD with RBBB; leaves open long-term outcome translation.
AIMS: The purpose of this study was to create an epicardial electroanatomic map of the right ventricle (RV) and then apply post-operative-targeted single- and dual-site RV temporary pacing with measurement of haemodynamic parameters. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is an established treatment for symptomatic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. In congenital heart disease, RV dysfunction is a common cause of morbidity-little is known regarding the potential benefits of CRT in this setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixteen adults (age = 32 ± 8 years; 6 M, 10 F) with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and repaired tetralogy of Fallot (n = 8) or corrected congenital pulmonary stenosis (n = 8) undergoing surgical pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) for pulmonary regurgitation underwent epicardial RV mapping and haemodynamic assessment of random pacing configurations including the site of latest RV activation. The pre-operative pulmonary regurgitant fraction was 49 ± 10%; mean LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) 85 ± 19 mL/min/m(2) and RVEDV 183 ± 89 mL/min/m(2) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The mean pre-operative QRS duration is 136 ± 26 ms. The commonest site of latest activation was the RV free wall and DDD pacing here alone or combined with RV apical pacing resulted in significant increases in cardiac output (CO) vs. AAI pacing (P < 0.01 all measures). DDDRV alternative site pacing significantly improved CO by 16% vs. AAI (P = 0.018), and 8.5% vs. DDDRV apical pacing (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Single-site RV pacing targeted to the region of latest activation in patients with RBBB undergoing PVR induces acute improvements in haemodynamics and supports the concept of 'RV CRT'. Targeted pacing in such patients has therapeutic potential both post-operatively and in the long term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Plymen et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: