Why the study?
Does contrast two-dimensional echocardiography improve the assessment of segmental wall motion abnormalities compared to noncontrast echocardiography in a murine model of myocardial infarction?
Does contrast two-dimensional echocardiography improve the assessment of segmental wall motion abnormalities compared to noncontrast echocardiography in a murine model of myocardial infarction?
Contrast-enhanced two-dimensional echocardiography significantly improves the visualization and accurate assessment of segmental wall motion abnormalities in awake mice following myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enhances preclinical wall motion assessment in murine MI; extends echo methods but leaves human translation open.
Murine models of cardiac disease are becoming an important tool for studying pathophysiological processes. Development of methods to accurately assess ventricular function are therefore important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of echocardiographic assessment of segmental wall motion abnormalities in a murine model of myocardial infarction. Two-dimensional contrast (C+) and noncontrast (C-) echocardiography were performed in 76 awake mice 2 days before and 2 days after left coronary ligation. The short-axis images obtained with two-dimensional echocardiography and corresponding postmortem cross-sectional histological samples stained with Evans blue dye were each divided into 16 segments, and all matched segments were examined for correlation between wall motion abnormalities and myocardial hypoperfusion. With the use of contrast enhancement, the number of visualized segments was significantly increased (base: C- 86%, C+ 98%; midpapillary: C- 57%, C+ 89%; apex: C- 30%, C+ 74%). Agreement between echocardiographically assessed regional wall motion abnormalities and pathologically determined hypoperfusion in basal, midpapillary, and apical levels were 90%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. Agreement between echocardiographically normal wall motion and pathologically normal findings in basal, midpapillary, and apical levels were 99%, 88%, and 71%, respectively. Thus echocardiographic assessment of segmental wall motion in awake mice was feasible and the accuracy was improved with the use of a contrast agent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suehiro et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: