Why the study?
Rapid identification and risk stratification of AHF among patients with dyspnoea are crucial, especially during the COVID-19 outbreak when physical examination is limited by personal protective equipment.
A multimarker approach using traditional and emerging biomarkers improves diagnosis and risk stratification in acute heart failure, which is particularly valuable during the COVID-19 pandemic when physical examination may be limited.
Emphasizes rapid AHF identification and risk stratification amid COVID-19; leaves open optimal tools when physical examination is limited.
Acute heart failure (AHF) affects millions of people worldwide, and it is a potentially life-threatening condition for which the cardiologist is more often brought into play. It is crucial to rapidly identify, among patients presenting with dyspnoea, those with AHF and to accurately stratify their risk, in order to define the appropriate setting of care, especially nowadays due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Furthermore, with physical examination being limited by personal protective equipment, the use of new alternative diagnostic and prognostic tools could be of extreme importance. In this regard, usage of biomarkers, especially when combined (a multimarker approach) is beneficial for establishment of an accurate diagnosis, risk stratification and post-discharge monitoring. This review highlights the use of both traditional biomarkers such as natriuretic peptides (NP) and troponin, and emerging biomarkers such as soluble suppression of tumourigenicity (sST2) and galectin-3 (Gal-3), from patients' emergency admission to discharge and follow-up, to improve risk stratification and outcomes in terms of mortality and rehospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aleksova et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: