Why the study?
Does intracoronary sTyr-PAA reduce infarct size in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction?
Does intracoronary sTyr-PAA reduce infarct size in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction?
Intracoronary sTyr-PAA significantly reduces myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury without affecting systemic coagulation in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction.
OBJECTIVES: Intracoronary administration of glycosaminoglycan analogs, including the complement inhibitor dextran sulfate, attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (I/R injury). However, dextran sulfate has a distinct anticoagulatory effect, possibly limiting its use in specific situations in vivo. We therefore developed multimeric tyrosine sulfate (sTyr-PAA), a novel, minimally anticoagulatory, fully synthetic non-carbohydrate-containing polyacrylamide conjugate, for in vivo testing in an acute closed-chest porcine model of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Following balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending artery just after the first diagonal branch (60-minute ischemia), sTyr-PAA (approx. 10 mg/kg bodyweight, fraction with strongest complement-inhibitory and minimal anticoagulatory properties, n = 11) or phosphate-buffered saline (controls, n = 9) was administered intracoronarily into ischemic myocardium prior to 120 min of reperfusion. RESULTS: sTyr-PAA significantly reduced infarct size (from 61.0 ± 12.0% of the ischemic area at risk to 39.4 ± 17.0%), plasma creatine kinase, local complement deposition and tissue factor upregulation, without affecting systemic coagulation. Protection was associated with significantly reduced myocardial neutrophil extravasation and translated into a significant improvement of ejection fraction and left ventricular enddiastolic pressure. CONCLUSIONS: sTyr-PAA protected significantly against myocardial I/R injury without substantially affecting systemic coagulation. Local intravascular sTyr-PAA administration may prove advantageous in situations where bleeding complications are likely or are to be avoided at all costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banz et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: