Why the study?
Does treatment with an Ang II type 1 receptor antagonist or N-acetylcysteine prevent cardiovascular inflammatory changes in a rat model of chronic NO synthesis inhibition?
Does treatment with an Ang II type 1 receptor antagonist or N-acetylcysteine prevent cardiovascular inflammatory changes in a rat model of chronic NO synthesis inhibition?
Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade or antioxidants prevent early cardiovascular inflammatory changes induced by nitric oxide deficiency in rats, highlighting the protective role of endothelium-derived NO against Ang II-mediated oxidative stress.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ang II blockade or antioxidants may blunt early vascular inflammation from NO deficiency in rats; leaves open human relevance.
BACKGROUND: The chronic inhibition of NO synthesis by N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) upregulates the cardiovascular tissue angiotensin II (Ang II)-generating system and induces cardiovascular inflammatory changes in rats. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a rat model to investigate the role of local Ang II activity in the pathogenesis of such inflammatory changes. Marked increases in monocyte infiltration into coronary vessels and myocardial interstitial areas, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) expression, and nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB, an important redox-sensitive transcriptional factor that induces MCP-1) activity were observed on day 3 of L-NAME administration. Along with these changes, vascular superoxide anion production was also increased. Treatment with an Ang II type 1 receptor antagonist or with a thiol-containing antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine, prevented all of these changes. CONCLUSIONS: Increased Ang II activity mediated via the type 1 receptor may thus be important in the pathogenesis of early cardiovascular inflammatory changes in this model. Endothelium-derived NO may decrease MCP-1 production and oxidative stress-sensitive signals by suppressing localized activity of Ang II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Usui et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: