Why the study?
Does bosentan improve cardiac and renal function in rats with chronic heart failure post-myocardial infarction?
Does bosentan improve cardiac and renal function in rats with chronic heart failure post-myocardial infarction?
In a rat model of post-MI heart failure, chronic endothelin receptor blockade with bosentan improved renal hemodynamics and sodium excretion, suggesting potential utility in human HF-associated renal dysfunction.
Endothelin blockade shows cardiorenal benefits in rat post-MI HF; leaves open translation to human patients.
OBJECTIVE: Importance of endothelin in mediating the chronic renal alterations of chronic heart failure was studied in rats chronically treated with bosentan after myocardial infarction. METHODS: Rats were subjected to coronary artery ligation and were treated for 8 weeks with placebo or bosentan, a dual ET(A) and ET(B) receptor antagonist, (approximately 100 mg/kg/day) as food admix. Sham-operated rats served as normal controls. Cardiac and renal functions were measured at the end of 8-week treatment. RESULTS: Bosentan significantly reduced the elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (from 26.6+/-3.3 to 11.4+/-2.2 mmHg, P<0.001) and the increased heart-to-body-weight ratio seen in untreated rats with myocardial infarction. Bosentan prevented the marked increase in renal vascular resistance (bosentan, 7.7+/-0.6; untreated, 15.6+/-2.5 mmHg/ml/min; P<0.001). This led to a significant increase in renal plasma flow resulting in a decrease in filtration fraction. Bosentan furthermore increased urinary sodium excretion. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged ET receptor blockade in rats with myocardial infarction has chronic renal vasodilatory effect and improves renal sodium excretory function. Thus, dual ET antagonists such as bosentan might be useful in the treatment of the progressive renal failure associated with human chronic heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siqing Ding (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: