Why the study?
Does a fiber Bragg grating pulse device accurately measure systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to the standard auscultatory method?
Does a fiber Bragg grating pulse device accurately measure systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to the standard auscultatory method?
A novel fiber Bragg grating pulse device can detect systolic and diastolic blood pressure by monitoring arterial pulse waveforms, offering a potential alternative to traditional auscultation.
FBGPD may enable non-auscultatory BP assessment; leaves open its accuracy and adoption in clinical practice.
We report a blood pressure evaluation methodology by recording the radial arterial pulse waveform in real time using a fiber Bragg grating pulse device (FBGPD). Here, the pressure responses of the arterial pulse in the form of beat-to-beat pulse amplitude and arterial diametrical variations are monitored. Particularly, the unique signatures of pulse pressure variations have been recorded in the arterial pulse waveform, which indicate the systolic and diastolic blood pressure while the patient is subjected to the sphygmomanometric blood pressure examination. The proposed method of blood pressure evaluation using FBGPD has been validated with the auscultatory method of detecting the acoustic pulses (Korotkoff sounds) by an electronic stethoscope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Umesh et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: