Why the study?
Does a dual-FBG sensor-based blood pressure estimation model accurately measure blood pressure compared to a commercial sphygmomanometer in adults aged 20-54?
Does a dual-FBG sensor-based blood pressure estimation model accurately measure blood pressure compared to a commercial sphygmomanometer in adults aged 20-54?
A low-cost dual-FBG sensor architecture provides accurate blood pressure estimation with mean errors of less than 1 mmHg compared to a commercial sphygmomanometer.
May support low-cost wearable BP monitoring; leaves open validation in larger clinical cohorts.
A low-cost dual-FBG (fiber Bragg grating) architecture is employed to capture the pulse waveform of the artery at the subject's wrist by measuring changes in optical power. The pulse transit time (PTT), pulse ascending time, and pulse descending time extracted from the pulse waveform are used in a blood pressure (BP) estimation model by fitting the measured BP with the reference BP obtained from a commercial sphygmomanometer. The estimation model is developed using data from 29 subjects at the age of 20 to 54. The results demonstrate that the errors between the calculated values and reference values of SBP and DBP for all of the 29 subjects both range from -4 to 5 mmHg with mean errors of 0.72 mmHg and 0.83 mmHg, respectively. The standard error can be found to be 2.45 and 2.59 mmHg for SBP and DBP, respectively. Also, it is found that this BP estimation model outperforms two BP models derived by considering PTT only.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: