Key result
Reference-assisted FBG sensing reduces pulse transit time variability by ~14 percentage points vs baseline methods.
Why the study?
Simultaneous pulse-wave sensing at the carotid and radial arteries is challenging because the two sites require different mechanical coupling conditions, and manually held carotid probes are susceptible to contact pressure and motion disturbances.
Does reference-assisted fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensing with reference FBG regression improve signal quality and reduce variability for simultaneous carotid-radial pulse-wave measurement and pulse-wave velocity estimation in a healthy adult?
Does reference-assisted fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensing with reference FBG regression improve signal quality and reduce variability for simultaneous carotid-radial pulse-wave measurement and pulse-wave velocity estimation in a healthy adult?
This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the technical feasibility of a reference-assisted fiber Bragg grating sensor system to improve signal quality and reduce variability during simultaneous carotid-radial pulse-wave velocity estimation.
Sensor-based carotid-radial PWV feasible in one case; leaves open validation and clinical utility in larger studies.
Simultaneous pulse-wave sensing at the carotid and radial arteries is challenging because the two sites require different mechanical coupling conditions and manually held carotid probes are susceptible to contact pressure and motion disturbances. This study presents a reference-assisted fiber Bragg grating (FBG) system comprising a wristband-type radial unit and a stamp-type carotid unit containing mechanically decoupled measurement and reference FBGs. Reference FBG regression (RFR) was used to suppress components shared by the carotid channels. In a 41.8 s recording from one male participant in his twenties, the reference and carotid measurement channels were essentially uncorrelated within the pulse-wave band (r = −0.05). After signal mean removal, RFR reduced power below 1 Hz by 74.3% without attenuating the pulse-band power (+11.4%), increasing the relative-power signal quality index from 0.174 to 0.458. Pulse transit time (PTT) was estimated by foot-centered windowed correlation. Analysis of 54 cardiac cycles yielded a representative PTT of 0.055 s. With an effective path length of 0.48 m, the corresponding pulse-wave velocity (PWV) was 8.7 m/s, with a within-record bootstrap 95% interval of 7.7–9.9 m/s. Estimates from eight non-overlapping 5 s segments were 9.1 ± 1.8 m/s. RFR produced lower segment-to-segment PTT variability than the baseline processing methods (coefficient of variation, 20.3% versus 34.6–46.7%). These results demonstrate the technical feasibility of reference-assisted FBG sensing for simultaneous carotid–radial pulse-wave acquisition and preliminary PWV estimation. Further validation requires higher-rate acquisition, repeated measurements, a larger cohort, and comparison with a reference PWV device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question. Reference-assisted fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensing with reference FBG regression (RFR) vs. Baseline processing methods was evaluated on Pulse-wave velocity (PWV) and segment-to-segment pulse transit time (PTT) variability (coefficient of variation) (PWV 8.7 m/s, 95% CI 7.7-9.9). Reference-assisted FBG sensing with RFR estimated carotid-radial PWV at 8.7 m/s (95% CI 7.7–9.9) and lowered PTT variability vs baseline methods (CV 20.3% vs 34.6–46.7%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: