Key result
VigileoCO shows moderate correlation with transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output during CABG surgery.
Why the study?
The accuracy and precision of a new arterial pulse contour-based continuous cardiac output device (Vigileo) needed validation against intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution and an established arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
Does the Vigileo arterial pulse contour-based device provide accurate and precise cardiac output measurements compared to transpulmonary thermodilution (TPCO) and calibrated pulse contour cardiac output (PCCO) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery?
Observational (n=22)
No
Does the Vigileo arterial pulse contour-based device provide accurate and precise cardiac output measurements compared to transpulmonary thermodilution (TPCO) and calibrated pulse contour cardiac output (PCCO) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery?
VigileoCO provides clinically acceptable assessment of cardiac output in postbypass closed-chest conditions and during stable conditions in the intensive care unit among CABG patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports cautious VigileoCO use for trends in stable post-CABG settings; leaves open need for randomized validation in unstable conditions.
Objective To evaluate the accuracy and precision of an arterial pulse contour-based continuous cardiac output device (Vigileo). Vigileo cardiac output (VigileoCO) was compared with intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output (TPCO) and an established arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output (PCCO). Design Prospective clinical study. Setting University hospital. Patients Twenty-two patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Interventions Defined volume load during surgery and in the postoperative period. Measurements and main results We obtained 184 pairs of VigileoCO and TPCO, 140 pairs of VigileoCO and PCCO, and 140 pairs of PCCO and TPCO. Measurements were performed after induction of anesthesia (T1), after sternotomy (T2), immediately after (T3) and 20 mins after volume challenge with 10 mL.kg hydroxyethyl starch 6% (T4), 15 mins after coronary pulmonary bypass (T5), after retransfusion of autologous blood (T6), after arrival at the intensive care unit (T7), and immediately after (T8) and 20 mins after (T9) a second volume load with 10 mL.kg hydroxyethyl starch 6%. TPCO was used to calibrate PCCO. For pooled data, including uncalibrated PCCO data immediately after weaning from coronary pulmonary bypass (T5), the correlation coefficient of TPCO vs. VigileoCO, PCCO vs. VigileoCO, and TPCO vs. PCCO was 0.75, 0.60, and 0.75 respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of 0.00, -0.01, and 0.02 L.min, the precision (=sd) was 0.87, 1.08, and 0.93 L.min, and the mean error was 33%, 40%, and 35%. When we compared calibrated PCCO values (T2-T4, T6, T7-9), the correlation coefficients of PCCO-VigileoCO and TPCO-PCCO were 0.72 and 0.85, bias was -0.16 and 0.19 L.min, and mean error was 33% and 27%, respectively. Best correlations and the least differences between TPCO and VigileoCO were observed in postbypass closed-chest conditions and in the intensive care unit. Conclusions Our results showed that VigileoCO enables clinically acceptable assessment of cardiac output in postbypass closed-chest conditions and during stable conditions in the intensive care unit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waal et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n=22). Vigileo arterial pulse contour-based continuous cardiac output device (VigileoCO) with defined volume load (hydroxyethyl starch 6%) vs. Intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output (TPCO) and calibrated arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output (PCCO) was evaluated on Accuracy (bias) and precision (SD) of cardiac output measurements compared to TPCO and PCCO (r=0.75 (TPCO vs VigileoCO); bias 0.00 L/min, precision 0.87 L/min, mean error 33%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: