Why the study?
Do different troponin I assays (AxSYM vs ACS:180) yield discordant results that impact the prediction of new myocardial infarction or death in patients with low-positive troponin levels?
Do different troponin I assays (AxSYM vs ACS:180) yield discordant results that impact the prediction of new myocardial infarction or death in patients with low-positive troponin levels?
Variable detection rates by different troponin I assays for low-positive samples represent a clinically significant problem, as discordant results are associated with varying rates of adverse clinical outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assay discordance in low-positive troponin I was associated with differing endpoint rates; hypothesis-generating for standardized assay protocols.
We compared troponin I (TnI) assays (AxSYM [Abbott]; ACS:180 [Bayer]) in blood samples with concentrations less than 10 ng/mL (< 10 micrograms/L). Discordant results were evaluated by linearity studies and by testing for rheumatoid factor. Patients with discordant TnI results were compared with patients with concordant results and patients with negative TnI who had a new myocardial infarction or died within 2 months of initial testing. Positive TnI cutoffs by AxSYM and ACS:180 were 0.7 ng/mL (0.7 microgram/L) and 0.13 ng/mL (0.13 microgram/L), respectively. We identified 173 specimens that were repeatedly positive by at least 1 assay; 143 specimens were positive by both assays. Twenty samples positive for TnI by AxSYM were negative by ACS:180, while 10 samples positive by ACS:180 were negative by AxSYM. The discordant samples showed no evidence of interfering substances, including rheumatoid factor. Clinical follow-up showed that 26% of patients with elevated TnI by both assays, 33% with TnI positive only by AxSYM, 22% with TnI positive only by ACS:180, and 8% with negative TnI by AxSYM encountered at least 1 clinical end point. Variable detection rates by these assays for low-positive TnI represent a clinically significant problem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lewis et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: