Why the study?
Does continuing antiplatelet therapy compared to interruption improve the balance of myocardial ischemia and bleeding in patients at risk of MI undergoing non-cardiac surgery?
Population
Patients at risk of myocardial infarction undergoing non-cardiac surgery
Comparison
Continuing antiplatelet therapy throughout… vs Interruption of antiplatelet therapy
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Supports continuing aspirin perioperatively to minimize thrombosis risk; leaves open optimal clopidogrel timing in stented patients.
Does continuing antiplatelet therapy compared to interruption improve the balance of myocardial ischemia and bleeding in patients at risk of MI undergoing non-cardiac surgery?
Continuing antiplatelet therapy during non-cardiac surgery is recommended for patients at high coronary risk to prevent thrombosis, as this risk outweighs surgical bleeding risks in most cases.
Chassot et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: