Why the study?
Cardiovascular health declines in young adulthood, prompting investigation into whether weight gain prevention interventions promote ideal cardiovascular health.
Do weight gain prevention interventions improve cardiovascular health in young adults?
Do weight gain prevention interventions improve cardiovascular health in young adults?
Weight gain prevention interventions using self-regulation with large or small changes significantly improve ideal cardiovascular health scores in young adults over 2 years.
Weight gain prevention improves CV metrics in young adults; extends LS7 evidence to early preventive interventions.
OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular health (CVH) declines in young adulthood. This study assessed whether weight gain prevention interventions promoted ideal CVH. METHODS: ) from a randomized controlled trial comparing two weight gain prevention interventions (self-regulation with large or small changes) and a self-guided control group completed anthropometric and clinical assessments at baseline and 2 years. CVH was quantified via the American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7 (LS7) number of ideal components met. RESULTS: Both interventions showed significant improvements in the average number of ideal LS7 components met at 2 years compared with control (pre- to post-treatment means; large change: 0.24, small change: 0.34, control: -0.2, p < 0.05). Moreover, a greater percentage of participants in both interventions improved by ≥1 ideal component (large change: 35%, small change: 37%, control: 29%) and a smaller percentage declined by ≥1 ideal component (large change: 16%, small change: 20%, control: 30%) compared with control. For individual LS7 components, the odds of having an ideal BMI and glucose varied by treatment condition at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Two weight gain prevention interventions led to improvements in ideal CVH at 2 years. Interventions explicitly focused on a broader constellation of LS7 domains might lead to even greater changes in CVH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayes et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: