Why the study?
Ventricular repolarization shows sex-specificity, with females having longer QT intervals and greater risk for drug-induced torsade de pointes and symptomatic long-QT syndrome.
Female mouse hearts exhibit delayed repolarization and a more pronounced response to calcium influx compared to males, driven by specific ionic currents, which may explain sex differences in arrhythmia risk.
Mouse ventricular slice optical mapping demonstrates sex-specific repolarization; leaves open translation to human torsade risk and requires validation.
Ventricular repolarization shows notable sex‐specificity, with female sex being associated with longer QT‐intervals in electrocardiography irrespective of the species studied. From a clinical point of view, women are at a greater risk for drug‐induced torsade de pointes and symptomatic long‐QT syndrome. Here, we present an optical mapping (OM) approach to reveal sex‐specific action potential (AP) heterogeneity in a slice preparation of mouse hearts. Left ventricular epicardial repolarization in female versus male mice shows longer and, interindividually, more variable AP duration (APD), yielding a less prominent transmural APD gradient. By combining OM with mathematical modeling, we suggest a significant role of I Kto,f and I Kur in AP broadening in females. Other transmembrane currents, including I NaL , only marginally affect basal APD. As in many cardiac pathophysiologies, increasing [Ca 2+ ] i poses a risk for arrhythmia, the response of AP morphology to enhanced activation of L‐type calcium channels (LTCC) was assessed in a sex‐selective manner. Both APD and its variation increased significantly more in female versus male mice after pharmacological LTCC activation, which we hypothesize to be due to sex‐specific I NaL expression based on mathematical modeling. Altogether, we demonstrate a more delayed repolarization of LV epicardium, a leveled LV transmural APD gradient, and a more pronounced epicardial APD response to Ca 2+ influx in females versus males. Mathematical modeling quantifies the relative contributions of selected ionic currents to sex‐specific AP morphology under normal and pathophysiological conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moussavi‐Torshizi et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: