Why the study?
Does isoflurane compared to enflurane affect haemodynamic parameters and safety in ASA I-II patients undergoing plastic surgery?
Does isoflurane compared to enflurane affect haemodynamic parameters and safety in ASA I-II patients undergoing plastic surgery?
Isoflurane and enflurane provide comparable haemodynamic stability during long plastic microsurgeries, with no significant adverse renal or hepatic effects.
May support interchangeable use in ASA I-II plastic surgery; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of hemodynamic equivalence.
Isoflurane and enflurane as main anaesthetics at 0.5-0.7% end-tidal concentrations in 70% N2O/30% O2 supplemented with fentanyl maintained smooth basal anaesthesia in ASA I-II patients during long (6-11 h) plastic surgery (n = 7 + 6) as well as during shorter (2-4 h) operations (n = 5 + 5). There were no statistically significant differences in haemodynamic parameters between isoflurane and enflurane patients, although mean arterial pressure was somewhat lower and heart rate higher in the isoflurane patients during the course of long anaesthesias. Both isoflurane and enflurane patients had to be given extra colloids and occasionally vasodilators to maintain peripheral temperature during the long anaesthesias. No clinically adverse renal or hepatic effects were seen, but the liver enzyme activities of four isoflurane and enflurane patients increased after the long anaesthesias. The highest serum inorganic fluoride concentration was 44 mumol/l in the enflurane patients and 5.6 mumol/l in the isoflurane patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. Oikkonen (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: