Why the study?
Does nicotine infusion alter hemodynamic and regional blood flow responses at rest and during exercise in conscious miniswine?
Does nicotine infusion alter hemodynamic and regional blood flow responses at rest and during exercise in conscious miniswine?
The detrimental hemodynamic effects of nicotine observed at rest in miniswine are minimized during exercise.
Exercise attenuates nicotine's hemodynamic effects in miniswine; leaves open translation to human cardiovascular risk during activity.
We hypothesized that nicotine compromises cardiovascular responses to dynamic exercise. Hemodynamic variables were measured in conscious miniswine before and at 2 min of nicotine infusion (20 micrograms.kg-1.min-1; i.a.; N = 6) during resting conditions. Mean arterial pressure elevations (MAP; 14%) and plasma nicotine concentrations (49 +/- 7 ng.ml-1) were similar to those elicited by cigarette smoking in humans. In addition, nicotine increased systemic vascular resistance (SVR; 56%), the heart rate x systolic blood pressure product (RPP; 11%), and regional vascular resistance in the left-ventricular, renal, and splanchnic circulations, while cardiac output decreased (CO; 23%) and skeletal muscle blood flow and vascular resistance were unaffected. Plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine increased by approximately 30% and 90%, respectively. On separate days, the same hemodynamic responses were measured before and at 20 min of treadmill running during vehicle or nicotine infusion for the last 2 min of exercise (N = 10). Nicotine increased MAP (6%), SVR (14%), and RPP (3%), and elevated vascular resistance in the proximal colon and pancreas. Moreover, compared to exercise + vehicle, norepinephrine and epinephrine increased by approximately 13% and 24%, respectively, during exercise + nicotine infusion. These findings suggest that the detrimental effects of nicotine observed at rest are minimized during exercise. Nicotine's effects may be reduced during exercise by competition from local vasodilators in the heart and active musculature, and/or by differing activation of sympathetic nerve activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Symons et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: