Why the study?
Does left ventricular strain assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography correlate with NT-proBNP levels in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation?
Does left ventricular strain assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography correlate with NT-proBNP levels in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation?
Global systolic longitudinal strain is an independent predictor of elevated NT-proBNP in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation, suggesting its utility in assessing early left ventricular dysfunction.
May refine subclinical LV assessment in chronic AR; hypothesis-generating for strain-guided monitoring pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the relationship between biochemical heart failure markers and conventional left ventricular (LV) measurements and strain assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography in chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: LV strain, rotation assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography, LV measurements, mitral annular plane excursion measured by M-mode, and systolic annular plane velocity measured by tissue Doppler echocardiography were analyzed in 64 controls and 65 chronic AR patients. Reduced LV longitudinal strain with increased apical rotation was seen in normal plasma NT-proBNP patients. Increased NT-proBNP (>400 pg/mL) was associated with reduced longitudinal and circumferential strain, diminished mitral annular plane excursions and systolic annular plane velocity. Global systolic longitudinal strain was an indepentent predictor of NT-proBNP level. Longitudinal strain less than 16.0% was the cutoff value for NT-proBNP>400 pg/mL (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LV strain analysis in conjunction with NT-proBNP evaluation is a useful tool in assessing LV function in AR patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mizarienė et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: