Why the study?
Recent findings suggesting CAS is not superior to best medical treatment and its frequent use over CEA warranted revisiting the role of CAS in asymptomatic carotid stenosis.
What is the role of carotid artery stenting compared to carotid endarterectomy or best medical treatment in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis?
What is the role of carotid artery stenting compared to carotid endarterectomy or best medical treatment in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis?
This review highlights the need for careful patient selection when considering carotid artery stenting for asymptomatic carotid stenosis, balancing it against carotid endarterectomy and modern best medical treatment.
CAS may not outperform CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis; leaves open optimal strategy pending higher-level evidence.
A clinical decision on the treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis is challenging, unlike symptomatic carotid stenosis. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been recommended as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) based on the finding that the efficacy and safety of CAS were comparable to CEA in randomized trials. However, in some countries, CAS is often performed more frequently than CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Moreover, it has been recently reported that CAS is not superior to the best medical treatment in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Due to these recent changes, the role of CAS in asymptomatic carotid stenosis should be revisited. When determining the treatment for asymptomatic carotid stenosis, one should consider several clinical factors including stenosis degree, patient life expectancy, stroke risk by medical treatment, availability of a vascular surgeon, high risk for CEA or CAS, and insurance coverage. This review aimed to present and pragmatically organize the information that is necessary for a clinical decision on CAS in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. In conclusion, although the traditional benefit of CAS is being revisited recently, it seems too early to conclude that CAS is no longer beneficial under intense and systemic medical treatment. Instead, a treatment strategy with CAS should evolve to select eligible or medically high-risk patients more precisely.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jang‐Hyun Baek (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: