Why the study?
Does SYNTAX score II predict 1-year MACCE in patients with ACS and severe CAD undergoing PCI?
Does SYNTAX score II predict 1-year MACCE in patients with ACS and severe CAD undergoing PCI?
SYNTAX score II is a useful tool for predicting 1-year clinical events in real-world patients with ACS and severe CAD undergoing PCI.
SS II may aid mortality prediction in real-world severe CAD ACS PCI; extends prior validation but leaves open prospective utility.
BACKGROUND: SYNTAX score II (SS II) integrates anatomical SS with clinical characteristics allowing an individualized prediction of long-term mortality. AIMS: We sought to assess to evaluate the usefulness of SS II in a real-world acute coronary syndromes (ACS) population with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: From August 2011 to May 2013, out of 1591 consecutive patients admitted for ACS, 217 (13.6%) showed severe CAD (three-vessel disease and/or left main involvement). Among the latter, 100 patients underwent PCI and were enrolled into the study. SS II was calculated in all patients. One-year clinical follow-up was performed; major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were defined as a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization. RESULTS: The median SS II was 29 (range, 14-59). Overall, MACCE occurred in 25% of patients (cardiac death 4%, myocardial infarction 4%, stroke 0%, and repeat revascularization 17%). The 1-year MACCE-free survival was significantly lower in patients with SS (⩾29), than in those with SS II (<29) (64.2% vs. 87.2%, respectively; p = 0.007). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the presence of unprotected left main stenosis [hazard ratio 2.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-5.85; p = 0.031] and SS II ⩾29 (hazard ratio 2.74, 95% CI: 1.30-8.21; p = 0.011) were the only predictors of MACCE at 1-year clinical follow-up. The c-index of SS score II was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.58-0.81). For patients who experienced MACCE, the SS II reclassification improved by 36%, while in nonevent patients the reclassification improved by 22%. The net reclassification index was 0.24 (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: SS II might represent a useful tool to predict clinical events in not only ideal stable patients, but also an unrestricted, real world population of patients with ACS and severe CAD undergoing PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azzarelli et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: