Key result
Higher step intensity links to broader cardiometabolic improvements than total step volume.
Cross-Sectional (n=635)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals that stepping intensity shows stronger associations with favorable cardiometabolic risk factors than step volume in an Asian population, highlighting the therapeutic importance of walking...
The health benefits of objectively measured physical activity volume versus intensity have rarely been studied, particularly in non-western populations. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between cardiometabolic risk factors and stepping activity including; volume (step count), intensity (cadence) or inactivity (zero-steps/minute/day), in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Participants clinical data was collected at baseline and their physical activity was monitored for seven days, using an accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X+) in 2016. Tertiles (low, moderate, high) of the mean daily step count, peak one-minute, 30-min, 60-min cadences and time/day spent at zero-steps/minute were calculated. Adjusted linear regressions explored the association between stepping activity tertiles and cardiometabolic risk factors. A total of 635 participants (41% male, 67% Chinese, mean age 48.4 years) were included in the analyses. The mean daily step count was 7605 (median daily step count 7310) and 7.8 h of awake time per day were spent inactive (zero-steps/minute). A greater number of associations were found for step intensity than volume. Higher step intensity was associated with reduced body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, blood pressures and higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Future health promotion initiatives should consider the greater role of step intensity to reduce cardiometabolic risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sumner et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiometabolic risk (n=635). Stepping activity (volume and intensity) vs. Lower stepping activity (tertiles) was evaluated on Cardiometabolic risk factors (BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, HDL). Among 635 participants averaging 7,605 steps/day, higher step intensity demonstrated a greater number of favorable associations with cardiometabolic risk factors than step volume.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: