Why the study?
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with severe, potentially life-threatening cardiovascular toxicities, requiring prompt identification, management, and multidisciplinary care.
What are the cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and how should they be managed?
What are the cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and how should they be managed?
Immune checkpoint inhibitors can cause severe cardiovascular toxicities such as myocarditis and arrhythmias, necessitating multidisciplinary surveillance and management by cardiologists and oncologists.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a significant breakthrough treatment of cancer, exert their function through enhancing the immune system's ability to recognize and attack cancer cells. However, these revolutionary cancer treatments have been associated with a range of immune-related adverse effects, including cardiovascular toxicity. The most commonly reported cardiovascular toxicities associated with ICIs are myocarditis, pericarditis, arrhythmias, and vasculitis. These cardiovascular manifestations are often severe and can lead to life-threatening complications. Therefore, prompt identification and management of these toxicities is critical, and a multidisciplinary teamwork by cardiologists and oncologists are required to ensure optimal patient outcomes. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the mechanisms underlying ICI-associated cardiovascular toxicity, clinical presentations of these toxicities, potential risk factors, diagnosis, management, and surveillance strategies during ICI therapy. While ICIs have already transformed cancer treatment, further research is needed to better understand and manage their immune-related cardiovascular effects, and possibly, to identify biomarkers which can predict the occurrence of these cardiovascular complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chitsazan et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: