Why the study?
Cardiovascular toxicity from immune checkpoint inhibitors is associated with serious consequences and high mortality, but its underlying mechanism remains unclear and underexplored.
What are the incidence, mechanisms, clinical manifestations, diagnoses, and treatment strategies for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated cardiovascular toxicities?
What are the incidence, mechanisms, clinical manifestations, diagnoses, and treatment strategies for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated cardiovascular toxicities?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of the diagnosis and management of severe cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionary effects on therapeutic strategies for multiple malignancies. Their efficacy depends on their ability to reactivate the host immune system to fight cancer cells. However, adverse reactions to ICIs are common and involve several organs, limiting their use in clinical practice. Although the incidence of cardiovascular toxicity is relatively low, it is associated with serious consequences and high mortality rates. The primary cardiovascular toxicities include myocarditis, pericarditis, Takotsubo syndrome, arrhythmia, vasculitis, acute coronary syndrome, and venous thromboembolism. Currently, the mechanism underlying ICI-associated cardiovascular toxicity remains unclear and underexplored. The diagnosis and monitoring of ICI-associated cardiovascular toxicities mainly include the following indicators: symptoms, signs, laboratory examination, electrocardiography, imaging, and pathology. Treatments are based on the grade of cardiovascular toxicity and mainly include drug withdrawal, corticosteroid therapy, immunosuppressants, and conventional cardiac treatment. This review focuses on the incidence, underlying mechanisms, clinical manifestations, diagnoses, and treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: