Why the study?
It was unclear whether baseline inspiratory muscle function predicts changes in aerobic capacity following a 12-week home-based inspiratory muscle training programme in patients with HFpEF.
Does baseline inspiratory muscle pressure predict changes in aerobic capacity after a 12-week home-based inspiratory muscle training program in older patients with HFpEF?
Does baseline inspiratory muscle pressure predict changes in aerobic capacity after a 12-week home-based inspiratory muscle training program in older patients with HFpEF?
Home-based inspiratory muscle training improves aerobic capacity in older patients with HFpEF regardless of baseline inspiratory muscle pressure.
Baseline inspiratory muscle strength may identify HFpEF patients likely to gain aerobic capacity from home-based training; leaves open prospective validation in randomized trials.
Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is a clinical syndrome characterised by reduced exercise capacity. Some evidence has shown that a simple and home-based programme of inspiratory muscle training offers promising results in terms of aerobic capacity improvement in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. This study aimed to investigate whether the baseline inspiratory muscle function predicts the changes in aerobic capacity (measured as peak oxygen uptake; peak VO 2 ) after a 12-week home-based programme of inspiratory muscle training in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Methods: A total of 45 stable symptomatic patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and New York Heart Association II–III received a 12-week home-based programme of inspiratory muscle training between June 2015 and December 2016. They underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing and measurements of maximum inspiratory pressure pre and post-inspiratory muscle training. Maximum inspiratory pressure and peak VO 2 were registered in both visits. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to assess the association between changes in peak VO 2 (Δ-peakVO 2 ) and baseline predicted maximum inspiratory pressure (pp-MIP). Results: The median (interquartile range) age was 73 (68–77) years, 47% were women and 35.6% displayed New York Heart Association III. The mean peak VO 2 at baseline and Δ-peakVO 2 post-training were 10.4±2.8 ml/min/kg and +2.2±1.3 ml/min/kg (+21.3%), respectively. The median (interquartile range) of pp-MIP and Δ-MIP were 71% (64–92) and 39.2 (26.7–80.4) cmH 2 O, respectively. After a multivariate analysis, baseline pp-MIP was not associated with Δ-peakVO 2 (β coefficient 0.005, 95% confidence interval −0.009–0.019, P=0.452). Conclusions: In symptomatic and deconditioned older patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, a home-based inspiratory muscle training programme improves aerobic capacity regardless of the baseline maximum inspiratory pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palau et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: