Why the study?
The review considers the role of sutureless aortic valve replacement compared with transcatheter replacement, including outcomes, disadvantages, and appropriate patient cohorts.
What is the role of sutureless aortic valve replacement compared to transcatheter replacement?
What is the role of sutureless aortic valve replacement compared to transcatheter replacement?
This review summarizes the comparative outcomes, disadvantages, and appropriate patient selection for sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Sutureless AVR may suit select surgical candidates; review leaves open optimal positioning versus TAVR absent randomized comparisons.
This review article considers the role of sutureless aortic valve replacement in the era of transcatheter replacement. Modern data regarding the outcomes of treatment with these two methods and its comparison are considered. Their main disadvantages and the cohorts of patients suitable for each technique are determined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsaroev et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: