Why the study?
Is high-resolution quantitative CMR perfusion analysis feasible for assessing myocardial perfusion in patients with heart failure?
Is high-resolution quantitative CMR perfusion analysis feasible for assessing myocardial perfusion in patients with heart failure?
High-resolution voxel-wise quantitative CMR perfusion assessment is feasible and can identify abnormal perfusion areas in patients with heart failure.
Supports feasibility of high-resolution CMR perfusion mapping in ischaemic HF; leaves open its clinical utility pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is playing an expanding role in the assessment of patients with heart failure (HF). The assessment of myocardial perfusion status in HF can be challenging due to left ventricular (LV) remodelling and wall thinning, coexistent scar and respiratory artefacts. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of quantitative CMR myocardial perfusion analysis in patients with HF. METHODS: A group of 58 patients with heart failure (HF; left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF ≤ 50%) and 33 patients with normal LVEF (LVEF >50%), referred for suspected coronary artery disease, were studied. All subjects underwent quantitative first-pass stress perfusion imaging using adenosine according to standard acquisition protocols. The feasibility of quantitative perfusion analysis was then assessed using high-resolution, 3 T kt perfusion and voxel-wise Fermi deconvolution. RESULTS: 30/58 (52%) subjects in the HF group had underlying ischaemic aetiology. Perfusion abnormalities were seen amongst patients with ischaemic HF and patients with normal LV function. No regional perfusion defect was observed in the non-ischaemic HF group. Good agreement was found between visual and quantitative analysis across all groups. Absolute stress perfusion rate, myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) and endocardial-epicardial MPR ratio identified areas with abnormal perfusion in the ischaemic HF group (p = 0.02; p = 0.04; p = 0.02, respectively). In the Normal LV group, MPR and endocardial-epicardial MPR ratio were able to distinguish between normal and abnormal segments (p = 0.04; p = 0.02 respectively). No significant differences of absolute stress perfusion rate or MPR were observed comparing visually normal segments amongst groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the feasibility of high-resolution voxel-wise perfusion assessment in patients with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sammut et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: