Why the study?
Is it feasible to use cardiac rehabilitation exercise programs for patients with mild cognitive impairment?
Is it feasible to use cardiac rehabilitation exercise programs for patients with mild cognitive impairment?
Cardiac rehabilitation exercise programs represent a feasible model for providing supervised exercise to patients with mild cognitive impairment and comorbid vascular risk.
May support cardiac rehab referrals for MCI with vascular risk; leaves open efficacy and adherence in prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Exercise is a promising strategy to prevent dementia, but no clinically supervised exercise program is widely available to people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The objective was to survey health professionals to assess the feasibility of using cardiac rehabilitation exercise programs for MCI populations. METHODS: We distributed surveys to: 1) health professionals working in cardiac rehabilitation exercise programs (36/72 responded); and 2) physicians who treat MCI (22/32 responded). Questions addressed clinician and clinic characteristics and feasibility of referring and accommodating people with MCI. RESULTS: Most cardiac rehabilitation exercise programs currently treat people with MCI (61.1%). Nearly all were willing and able to accept people with MCI and comorbid vascular risk (91.7%), though only a minority could accept MCI without vascular risk (16.7%). Although most physicians recommend exercise to people with MCI (63.6%), few referred patients with MCI to programs or people to guide exercise (27.3%). However, all physicians (100%) would refer patients with MCI to a cardiac rehabilitation exercise program. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports cardiac rehabilitation exercise programs as a feasible model of exercise for patients with MCI with vascular risk. Patients with and without vascular risk could likely be accommodated if program mandates were expanded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Intzandt et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: