Key result
Periostin serum levels were significantly higher in systemic sclerosis patients compared to healthy controls (32.7 vs. 27.7 ng/mL, p<0.001), and its expression in uninvolved skin may predict rapid cutaneous progression.
Why the study?
This study aimed to evaluate periostin serum levels and skin expression in patients with systemic sclerosis.
Does periostin expression predict rapid cutaneous progression in patients with systemic sclerosis?
Observational (n=80)
No
Does periostin expression predict rapid cutaneous progression in patients with systemic sclerosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 32.7% vs 27.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
Periostin expression in clinically uninvolved skin may serve as a useful biomarker to identify systemic sclerosis patients at high risk for rapid cutaneous progression.
Does not support clinical use in systemic sclerosis; leaves open periostin as a progression biomarker pending validation.
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate periostin serum levels and skin expression in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods We enrolled 35 patients with diffuse (d-SSc) or limited (l-SSc) SSc, 15 patients with very early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (VEDOSS), and 30 sex-matched healthy controls. Periostin serum levels were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Periostin skin expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on paired involved and uninvolved 5-mm skin biopsy samples in a subgroup of 10 d-SSc and 10 L-SSc patients. A 12-month follow-up was considered. Results We included 50 patients (mean age 53.1 ± 16.1 years; women 94%; mean disease duration 38.2 ± 45.1 months; anti-centromere 50%; anti-Scl70 40%), 35 of them with a definite SSc (68.8% l-SSc; 31.4% d-SSc; mean mRSS 9.0 ± 7.2) and 15 with VEDOSS; 30 controls were also included in this study. Periostin serum levels were higher in SSc patients compared to controls (32.7 ± 8.0 ng/mL vs. 27.7 ± 7.3 ng/mL; p < 0.001), while these levels were comparable among different groups of patients (29.7 ± 6.9 ng/mL in VEDOSS, 33.4 ± 7.8 ng/mL in lc-SSc; and 34.0 ± 8.5 in dc-SSc; p = ns). SSc patients with digital ulcers had higher periostin serum levels (36.2 ± 7.9 ng/mL vs. 30.6 ± 7.3 ng/mL, p < 0.02). Samples from the involved skin of l-SSc and d-SSc patients showed a significant dermal expression of periostin; an identical periostin expression was evident in the uninvolved skin of patients with d-SSc. In 7 out of 10 L-SSc patients, periostin expression was absent on uninvolved skin. In the remaining three l-SSc patients, a mild periostin expression on IHC was detectable on uninvolved skin and all of these three l-SSc patients presented a dramatic skin progression. Conclusion Periostin skin expression may be a useful biomarker to indicate the presence of a disease at a higher risk of rapid cutaneous involvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Systemic sclerosis (n=80). Systemic sclerosis vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Periostin serum levels (p=<0.001). Periostin serum levels were significantly higher in systemic sclerosis patients compared to healthy controls (32.7 vs. 27.7 ng/mL, p<0.001), and its expression in uninvolved skin may predict rapid cutaneous progression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: