Key result
An individualized transfer function reduced the root-mean-squared error of central aortic blood pressure estimation by 30% compared to a nonindividualized transfer function (p < 10^-4) in swine.
Why the study?
Does an individualized transfer function improve the estimation of central aortic blood pressure from peripheral blood pressure compared to a nonindividualized transfer function in swine subjects?
Does an individualized transfer function improve the estimation of central aortic blood pressure from peripheral blood pressure compared to a nonindividualized transfer function in swine subjects?
Effect estimate: 30% reduction
p-value: p=< 10 (-4)
An individualized transfer function significantly improves the accuracy of estimating central aortic blood pressure from peripheral waveforms in a swine model, particularly under nonnormative physiologic conditions.
Promising in swine but not ready for clinical use; leaves open translation to human central aortic BP estimation.
This paper presents a new approach to the estimation of unknown central aortic blood pressure waveform from a directly measured peripheral blood pressure waveform, in which a physics-based model is employed to solve for a subject- and state-specific individualized transfer function (ITF). The ITF provides the means to estimate the unknown central aortic blood pressure from the peripheral blood pressure. Initial proof-of-principle for the ITF is demonstrated experimentally through an in vivo protocol. In swine subjects taken through wide range of physiologic conditions, the ITF was on average able to provide central aortic blood pressure waveforms more accurately than a nonindividualized transfer function. Its usefulness was most evident when the subject's pulse transit time deviated from normative values. In these circumstances, the ITF yielded statistically significant reductions over a nonindividualized transfer function in the following three parameters: 1) 30% reduction in the root-mean-squared error between estimated versus actual central aortic blood pressure waveform (p < 10 (-4)), 2) >50% reduction in the error between estimated versus actual systolic and pulse pressures ( p < 10 (-4)), and 3) a reduction in the overall breakdown rate (i.e., the frequency of estimation errors >3 mmHg, p < 10 (-4)). In conclusion, the ITF may offer an attractive alternative to existing methods that estimates the central aortic blood pressure waveform, and may be particularly useful in nonnormative physiologic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hahn et al. (2011) studied this question. Individualized transfer function (ITF) vs. Nonindividualized transfer function was evaluated on Root-mean-squared error between estimated versus actual central aortic blood pressure waveform (30% reduction, p=< 10 (-4)). An individualized transfer function reduced the root-mean-squared error of central aortic blood pressure estimation by 30% compared to a nonindividualized transfer function (p < 10^-4) in swine.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: