Why the study?
Do external carotid pulse recordings provide reliable diagnostic criteria for aortic stenosis when compared to healthy individuals and patients with other cardiovascular disorders?
Do external carotid pulse recordings provide reliable diagnostic criteria for aortic stenosis when compared to healthy individuals and patients with other cardiovascular disorders?
This study aims to establish reliable diagnostic criteria for aortic stenosis using external carotid pulse recordings in a rigorously confirmed patient cohort.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid noninvasive aortic stenosis diagnosis; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
The brachial pulse is unreliable in the diagnosis of aortic stenosis as it may fail to show distinctive changes (Hancock and Abelmann, 1957; Hancock and Fleming, 1963). The carotid pulse should be more satisfactory for this purpose, since it reflects central events more clearly and external recordings reproduce the pressure pulse simply and adequately In 1956 Duchosal et al. reported the use of extemal carotid pulse recordings in the diagnosis of aortic stenosis. Daoud, Reppert, and Butterworth (1959) and Smith et al. (1959) also found the method valuable, but these investigators relied on clinical diagnosis in most of their patients, and each group used a different method to analyse the pulse. The present study is an attempt to define reliable diagnostic criteria, and patients with aortic stenosis have been included only when the diagnosis has been proved by left heart catheterization, operation, or necropsy. Their pulse tracings have been compared with those from healthy people and patients with a wide variety of cardiovascular disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
B. Robinson (1963) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: