Why the study?
Does urinary dipstick testing accurately detect abnormal proteinuria compared to laboratory measurements in renal patients?
Does urinary dipstick testing accurately detect abnormal proteinuria compared to laboratory measurements in renal patients?
Urinary dipstick testing is a useful screening tool for abnormal proteinuria, with mid-morning sampling recommended to ensure detection of isolated orthostatic proteinuria.
May support dipstick screening in renal clinics; extends validation data but should not yet replace 24-h collections.
The value of the urinary dipstick in the assessment of proteinuria was investigated in a study correlating laboratory measurements of protein and albumin against the dipstick protein in the same samples of urine; 94 patients (100 admissions) were studied at the Royal Air Force Renal Unit, each patient collecting two 24-h urine samples. Along with each 24-h sample, 10-ml aliquots of urine were obtained at 3 designated times during the day for both ward dipstick testing and laboratory assay; + or more on the dipstick correlated with abnormal proteinuria (greater than or equal to 150 mg/24 h) in 88% of cases, whilst trace values straddled the level of significant proteinuria. Further differentiation of trace was possible by repeat testing during the day. The subsequent presence of a dipstick negative during that day correlated with normality in all but 5% of cases. In order to ensure detection of renal disease presenting as isolated orthostatic proteinuria, assay of the mid-morning sample is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harrison et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: