Key result
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were not superior to calcium channel blockers in reducing 24-hour urine protein or urinary albumin excretion rates in patients with diabetic nephropathy.
Why the study?
Whether calcium channel blockers are as effective as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in treating diabetic nephropathy remains controversial.
Does Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) improve urinary protein and GFR compared to Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypertension?
Meta-Analysis (n=430)
Does Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) improve urinary protein and GFR compared to Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypertension?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ACEIs and CCBs provide similar efficacy in improving blood pressure, urinary albumin excretion, and glomerular filtration rate in patients with diabetic nephropathy.
Background: The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) could improve the symptoms of diabetic nephropathy. Whether the calcium channel blockers (CCBs) could be as effective as ACEIs on treating diabetic nephropathy is controversial. Here, we aimed to compare the efficacy of ACEIs with CCBs on the treatment of diabetic nephropathy by performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: The Pubmed, Medline, Embase and The Cochrane Database were searched up to July 2017 for eligible randomized clinical trials studies. Effect sizes were summarized as mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (P-value<0.05). Results: Seven RCTs involving 430 participants comparing ACEIs with CCBs were included. No benefit was seen in comparative group of ACEIs on systolic blood pressure(SBP) (MD=1.05 mmHg; 95% CI: -0.97 to 3.08, P=0.31), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (MD= -0.34 mmHg; 95% CI: -1.2 to 0.51, P=0.43), urinary albumin excretion rates (UAER) (MD=1.91μg/min; 95% CI: -10.3 to 14.12, P=0.76), 24-h urine protein (24-UP) (SMD=-0.26; 95%CI: -0.55 to 0.03, P=0.08), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (SMD=0.01; 95% CI: -0.38 to 0.41, P=0.95). On safety aspect, the risk of adverse reactions between ACEIs group and CCBs group are similar (RR=1.18; 95% CI: 0.61 to 2.28; P=0.61). Conclusion: Both ACEIs and CCBs could improve the BP, UAER, 24h-UP, and GFR of diabetic nephropathy to a similar extent
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis in Diabetic nephropathy (n=430). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) vs. Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) was evaluated on 24-h urine protein (24-UP) (SMD -0.26, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.03, p=0.08). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were not superior to calcium channel blockers in reducing 24-hour urine protein or urinary albumin excretion rates in patients with diabetic nephropathy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: