Key result
In a patient with severe left ventricular dysfunction, unloading the left ventricle with an Impella CP device unmasked a significant left main stenosis by lowering the FFR from 0.83 to 0.65.
Why the study?
Precise characterization of angiographically intermediate LM stenoses using IVUS and FFR is crucial, but increased LV pressures might affect FFR measurements.
Does Impella CP mechanical circulatory support improve the accuracy of fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement in a patient with left main stenosis and severe left ventricular dysfunction?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does Impella CP mechanical circulatory support improve the accuracy of fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement in a patient with left main stenosis and severe left ventricular dysfunction?
In patients with severe LV dysfunction and high filling pressures, FFR may underestimate left main stenosis severity, which can be unmasked by LV unloading with an Impella device.
Alerts to potential FFR inaccuracy in severe LV dysfunction for LM lesions; leaves open need for adjusted thresholds in prospective studies.
As identification of left main (LM) stenoses has prognostic and therapeutic relevance, a precise anatomic and/or functional characterization of angiographically intermediate LM stenoses, by using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) respectively, is crucial (1). However, increased left ventricular (LV) pressures might affect FFR measurements (2). Here we describe the case of a patient with chronic coronary syndrome and severe LV dysfunction in whom coronary angiography revealed an intermediate LM stenosis and catheterization identified an increased LV end-diastolic pressure. FFR measurement showed disproportionally higher FFR values compared with the minimal luminal area assessed by IVUS. When cardiac output was artificially augmented by using Impella for assisting percutaneous coronary intervention, the value of FFR measurement turned out proportional to what expected for the degree of anatomical stenosis. This discrepancy between anatomic and functional measurement may be a sign of coronary autoregulation dysfunction and therefore could help to identify high-risk patients in whom the use of a mechanical support device is more beneficial during percutaneous revascularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mennuni et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Chronic coronary syndrome and severe left ventricular dysfunction (n=1). Impella CP device vs. Without Impella CP support was evaluated on Fractional flow reserve (FFR). In a patient with severe left ventricular dysfunction, unloading the left ventricle with an Impella CP device unmasked a significant left main stenosis by lowering the FFR from 0.83 to 0.65.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: