Why the study?
Collateral injury to the esophagus remains a concern during left atrial ablation for AF, prompting protocols using esophageal temperature management to reduce thermal injury.
Does cooling or warming the esophagus reduce esophageal injury during left atrial ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does cooling or warming the esophagus reduce esophageal injury during left atrial ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
This protocol describes a method for using an esophageal temperature management device to mitigate thermal injury during left atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Esophageal temperature modulation protocol may reduce injury risk during AF ablation; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm safety and efficacy.
Ablation of the left atrium using either radiofrequency (RF) or cryothermal energy is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) and is the most frequent type of cardiac ablation procedure performed. Although generally safe, collateral injury to surrounding structures, particularly the esophagus, remains a concern. Cooling or warming the esophagus to counteract the heat from RF ablation, or the cold from cryoablation, is a method that is used to reduce thermal esophageal injury, and there are increasing data to support this approach. This protocol describes the use of a commercially available esophageal temperature management device to cool or warm the esophagus to reduce esophageal injury during left atrial ablation. The temperature management device is powered by standard water-blanket heat exchangers, and is shaped like a standard orogastric tube placed for gastric suctioning and decompression. Water circulates through the device in a closed-loop circuit, transferring heat across the silicone walls of the device, through the esophageal wall. Placement of the device is analogous to the placement of a typical orogastric tube, and temperature is adjusted via the external heat-exchanger console.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zagrodzky et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: