Why the study?
Does flecainide improve the suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations compared to quinidine in patients with chronic stable ventricular ectopic depolarizations?
Does flecainide improve the suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations compared to quinidine in patients with chronic stable ventricular ectopic depolarizations?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Flecainide achieves superior suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations versus quinidine; confirms its efficacy advantage for chronic stable cases.
In a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial, we compared flecainide to quinidine for treatment of ventricular ectopic depolarizations in 19 patients. The mean percent suppression of total ventricular ectopic depolarizations was 95% for flecainide and 56% for quinidine (p less than 0.05). A greater than 80% reduction of total ventricular ectopic depolarizations was obtained in eight of nine patients given flecainide and in five of ten patients given quinidine (p = 0.09). After the randomized protocol, the patients who had received quinidine were given flecainide; 9 of the 10 patients had greater than 80% reduction of total ventricular ectopic depolarizations. Flecainide produced 100% suppression of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and 99.5% suppression of paired ventricular depolarizations. Flecainide prolonged the PR and QRS intervals; quinidine prolonged the PR and JTC intervals. Side effects were commoner with quinidine than flecainide (p = 0.06). Three other patients failed to complete the protocol because of serious adverse experiences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salerno et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: